Asklemmy

43856 readers

2099 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What is the most logically empty argument that supports capitalism? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by LeninZedong@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Specifically, what arguments fail (that support capitalism) due to faulty evidence, misunderstanding of capitalism, lack of knowledge regarding Marxism, etc.?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

Oh, you about to give me started now.

Adam Smith had another book entirely about morality. The current use of Adam Smith is wrong. Personally, for me, modern economics is a theory of selfishness, but if you go back and read Adam Smith both of the Theory of Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations. You know, he connects morality, educational economics there, they're connected.

Modern economics says nothing about morality (because it tries to supplant all alternatives entirely), thus justifying all sorts of social ills.