281
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Magnolia_@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Oh, you need media codecs out of the box to watch pretty much anything in your browser?

That takes Fedora out.

OpenSUSE has probably the most confusing install interface for a noob you'll ever find. Which DE do I choose? What other software do I put in? How do I partition? Oh, I click a button here to make a user, or can I ignore it completely?

So much for OpenSUSE.

And don't get me started on Arch. You'd be way better off pushing a new user to Manjaro but everyone's got their panties in a twist about its devs.

Whatcha got now, big guy?

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

This is where Universal Blue and Nobara come in. They are made to be plug and play versions of fedora inc. media codecs, Nvidia, steam, and so on.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

FWIW, +1 for Nobara. I think it's an excellent turnkey Fedora for most purposes. But it's a little chancy on being dependent on a single maintainer.

But Fedora itself isn't noob friendly when you have to figure out how to add the non-free repos and install all the rest of the shit. Nobara takes care of that well.

[-] ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Are media codecs hard to install on Fedora? I haven’t daily driven Fedora in a while, but last I remember it was one of the top-level categories in GNOME Software. Click it then install all the things. Although I suppose if the user didn’t know what a media codec is that wouldn’t help them very much

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Not anymore. They completely divested that off to having to get RPM Fusion repos set up and then manually install the codecs.

As another user said, Nobara does all this, and I use Nobara myself. But Fedora itself has made all that harder.

[-] ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Oh that’s a shame. Yeah, then I’m right with you, that’s not beginner friendly

[-] NakedGardenGnome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Endeavouros ofcourse! All the goodness of arch, but with the ease of installation of any other desktop based distro!

[-] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Agreed, this is the distro that worked best for my needs (modern security, without wanting to die from maintenance of that security)

[-] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

How do I partition?

This can be said about any OS installer. Even Windows.

[-] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago
[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I am sure Win7 installer has it and if, I didn't get early dementia, Win10 installer has too.

Ubuntu is fine. Pop!_OS if you're set on Flatpaks instead of Snaps.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Oh no! What's a desktop environment!? NEXT!

[-] wesifa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Honestly, Ubuntu and its variants are probably the best distros. It's not great, it has its drawbacks, but to get people started, perfectly fine.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
281 points (77.7% liked)

Linux

48008 readers
583 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS