Programming

17443 readers

296 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Question: Does the build number always increment no matter the version or does the build number resets to 1 for every new version? (programming.dev)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by MortySmith@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kennebel@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That is 100% up to every team to decide. Version numbering is completely arbitrary.

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Since version 3, TeX has used an idiosyncratic version numbering system, where updates have been indicated by adding an extra digit at the end of the decimal, so that the version number asymptotically approaches π. This is a reflection of the fact that TeX is now very stable, and only minor updates are anticipated. The current version of TeX is 3.141592653

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Knuth has also decided that once he dies, a last version will be made which sets the version number exactly to pi.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's gonna live a long life. Until we know pi.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 points 4 months ago

He has to finish section 7.2.2 of his book

[–] Cirk2@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wish. Sadly the google play store requires monotonically increasing build numbers, so any option of resetting build numbers after major releases goes out the window.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 4 months ago

Do Google engineers get off on writing software that's only compatible within their own little world, then offering it as some de facto standard?

Google Cloud had a ton of these that make it arbitrarily hard to use.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I had lengthy discussions about that because two companies conventions collided.

We talked literally hours about the benefits of build numbers, branch specific identifiers and so on.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What conclusion did you come to?

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago

None. The project was ultimately cancelled for unrelated reasons.