this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
27 points (93.5% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1648 readers
8 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Dave@lemmy.nz
RaoulDuke@lemmy.nz
27
Housing reforms mean a free market and 'extremely ugly buildings', developer says (www.rnz.co.nz)
submitted 4 months ago by Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz to c/newzealand@lemmy.nz
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Some quite out of touch comments in here, I think. Saying "unlikely they would imitate the stylish apartment blocks that can be seen in the likes of Paris or Rome." when a large chunk of our population currently don't have a hope of ever owning a home is pretty elitist, in my view.

They also mention 50m2 as being considered the minimum for banks to lend to you, I live in a three bedroom house that's 100, a living space for one person can definitely be less than half that.

I really hope we can get more dwellings built that are affordable for a single person, that's something currently missing from our market, I feel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And that means these hypothetical new builds will be unaffordable?

You're going to have to explain your reasoning here, we've had a shortage of housing for a very long time, how will ending that shortage not help?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who's talking about new builds?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The news article you're commenting on?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yet my comment wasn't. Clearly.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You didn't read the article, did you?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Course I did. I also read the part about developers being against it. Which was the topic of my comment. Which you didn't read.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So, you read the article, and proceeded to start an argument about an entirely different topic?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

No. That's exactly what you did here though.