UK Politics

3087 readers

89 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

240

Labour lifts Tories’‘absurd’ ban on onshore windfarms (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by frankPodmore@slrpnk.net to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And while the Greens are doing what they do best (opposing green development), the Labour government has already lifted the Tory ban on onshore windfarms.

This is odd, because Labour are the same as the Tories, as we all know, and the Greens are a radical new force. But in this case, Labour are doing the direct opposite of the Tories, while the Greens are doing the same things the Tories did! Most curious.

EDIT: Here's the official government statement confirming this.

EDIT 2: And this isn't all! Rachel Reeves is also planning to do more to make onshore wind simpler to build.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What was it like next to a coal plant? Did you get ash? Coughing fits?

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

asthma. So much asthma. The area I grew up had 3 coal plants and the highest rates of asthma in the country, supposedly.

so, yes.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No ash or dark fumes emitted - I assume did something clever underground to capture or filter it. But plenty of steam billowed out of the cooling tower. During cooler parts of the year, the steam would freeze and turn into snow which was a lot of fun to go and have a snowball fight in late autumn.

But then again, I’m possibly just blissfully ignorant and lung cancer will get me any day now.

[–] waz@feddit.uk 4 points 4 months ago

Ash separators and flue gas desulphurisation. That keeps the stack from having grey/brown or yellow fumes, which would contain the ash as solids to drop out or the sulphur dioxide that contributes to acid rain. Cooling towers are of course only water vapour, so as long as the visible emission of the central thin stack on a coal power station is white, it’s running clean.

[–] JustCopyingOthers@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Ash only once when the filters failed. You'd occasionally get "power station frost". If the wind was in the right direction on freezing days moisture from the cooling towers would freeze to give a 100m wide avenue of thick haw frost. There's a lot of big transmission lines that aren't pretty and buzz when it rains. (wind/solar don't need lines this big)