108
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pop@lemmy.ml 32 points 3 months ago

20 TB at that price range could brankrupt some small cloud providers. Selfhosting would be much easier without having to worry about space. IF the price stays the same, but we'll see.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I don't think the vast majority use cloud storage because it's cheap. The vast majority use it because they are unwilling or unable to setup their own.

Hosting an Internet facing service out of your own house requires constant maintenance for security.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

I self host, and drop encrypted backups onto a cloud storage provider. If anything, cheap storage is going to cost me more because I'll be inclined to back more up.

[-] peregus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Damn, you're right! That cheap SSD could bankrupt us! 🙈😆

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago

Right. And if you want to self host with some geographic redundancy, it requires having friends or family with a good Internet connection who are willing to let you have a server at their place. Not impossible, but can be annoying.

I'm setting up a raspberry pi+HDD at family's house, with wireguard to my home network. Fun stuff, but it's not an off-the-shelf solution, especially when you consider that it's not my Internet access, it's theirs, so trying to be polite with bandwidth/data caps means it's a bit kneecapped.

[-] hswolf@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, there are a lot of security layers checks that big providers handle that most beginners users don't even know exist.

I can't imagine the damage of someone breaching through your server and reaching your personal network.

Also an extra machine, if you plan to have 99% uptime.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

I’d be interested what the wear-leveling and write-cycles look like. $250 for 20TB is half the current price of decent spinning rust, but if they’ll die in a year because they’re part of a Ceph cluster or ZFS array, that’s gonna be a no from me, dawg.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

My bulk media is practically WORM anyway. BRING IT ON!

[-] TheFrenchGhosty@lemmy.pussthecat.org -1 points 3 months ago

$250 for 20TB is half the current price of decent spinning rust

No? Like, not at all.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

WD Red Pro 20TB = $420 MSRP, $380 cheapest I’ve found. Not considering taxes/shipping in that

So, you’re splitting hairs by saying that’s not half. Point stands

16-18 TB HDD have been at that price for like 5 years, it doesn't mean most people buy them

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
108 points (97.4% liked)

datahoarder

6699 readers
1 users here now

Who are we?

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.

-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS