this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
769 points (98.6% liked)

News

23275 readers
4540 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The same percentage of employed people who worked remotely in 2023 is the same as the previous year, a survey found

Don’t call it work from home any more, just call it work. According to new data, what once seemed like a pandemic necessity has become the new norm for many Americans.

Every year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) releases the results of its American time use survey, which asks Americans how much time they spend doing various activities, from work to leisure.

The most recent survey results, released at the end of June, show that the same percentage of employed people who did at least some remote work in 2023 is the same percentage as those who did remote work in 2022.

In other words, it’s the first stabilization in the data since before the pandemic, when only a small percentage of workers did remote work, and a sign that remote work is here to stay.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (5 children)

It is? Then why can't I find a single work from home job that isn't a fake listing?

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Found one real job this year without any problems. Maybe look worldwide? You're not any longer bound to your city or your county when looking for 100% remote.

I had to shift this attitude myself when I started looking around this year. Was used to only look for jobs nearby to reduce commute... Bullshit. Opened up for worldwide (English is business language nearly everywhere) and now happily work remote 100%.

I wish you much success!

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You're not any longer bound to your city or your county

And neither are people in every other country, including low wage countries...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's always been the case though. He's have always outsourced to other countries but they can't do it completely because the quality of the work just isn't there. Because they're not trained.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

the quality of the work just isn't there. Because they're not trained.

That hasn't stopped thousands of companies from trying it, though.

Often more than once... (including the company I used to work for - they've outsourced, and re-homed a couple of times in the years I worked there.)

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Scheduling alone makes it worth it to hire people in every hemisphere.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

One of the vendors I used to deal with had support engineers in 4 different time zones so there would be someone on day shift no matter when they needed to deal with a problem.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's an incentive to hire everyone in one hemisphere, unless we're talking about a world wide company that needs people in multiple times zones.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Every company I've worked with since 2007, big or small, has dealt with people in multiple time zones. Even when i was a freelancer.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Timezones and hemispheres are different things.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Good idea. Thanks for the tip.

BTW, which recruiting platform do you use? I've had zero luck on Indeed, LinkedIn, and Craigslist.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Every job I have ever had off LinkedIn has been because somebody contacted me, I just sort of maintain the LinkedIn site just in case somebody decides they want to head hunt me but I don't really consider it anything other than a passive collector of information. Certainly wouldn't use it as my primary jump hunting site.

Also Craigslist? Unless you're looking to be an organ donor I don't think you're going to have much look there

[–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you're looking for just WFH jobs, check out FlexJobs. There's a membership fee, but because it's oriented towards remote work and because the end users pay part of the cost, it filters out a lot of the bullshit jobs.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Man I was I was really excited for this one, given my shitty experience with job hunting in the past (as I've mentioned). So today I finally went to the website, filled out their survey... Got one job listing in my results, for a programming gig. Yes seriously, just one single shitty result. I don't even know how to code. *sigh*

Thanks for trying but I should have known better than to get my hopes up. Guess I'll just die.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
  1. Find companies that support wfh
  2. Apply directly
  3. ???
  4. Profit?
[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

But I've been driving up and down all the streets and can't find any remote offices!

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I literally have a company issued WFH laptop, from a company that now requires people to be in office again.

It’s not the jobs it’s the middle managers and real estate.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Try reading the article? They are pointing out that the percentage of people who did at least some work from home did not decrease between 2022 and 2023. This is not even full WFH. So what we see now is probably what it's going to look like going forward.

I hate to be a dick, but if you're struggling to find a job, and this is at all representative of your ability to do basic research, you have a glaring weakness that you can work on.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

A big problem is the volume of fake listings.