this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
543 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19145 readers
3145 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It was reported that the weapon was his father’s.

Sometimes not even a safe will keep everything locked up. With enough time you can saw through most of the commercially available ones.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

With enough time you can saw through most of the commercially available ones.

This is technically true but with the amount of time and effort it takes to get through a good portion of the safes I've seen, it would honestly be easier to go and steal one from some schmuck with a truck gun or whatever that's insecurely, uhhh, secured.

[–] Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There are insurance/registration issues that can address that. Of course there endless possible hypotheticals. I'm personally in favor of some sort of "drivers license" equivalent for guns.

But a 21 year old age limit almost certainly would have prevented Uvalde.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I am highly skeptical of registration because there is a 99.99% certainty that it will be the GOP to use it and strip away weapons from anyone who is not a registered Republican.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Aside from the rather extreme criticisms (genocide stuff), universal registration is a bad idea for everyone because these things keep getting hacked/leaked:

If you are on the registry, it's an invitation to descrimination or careful/skilled burglary.

If you aren't on the registry, it's an invitation for violent crime with little/no resistance.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

disagree. if people want to do something, terrible or not, they will find a way illegally.

I'm going to go very basic here and say look at piracy.

[–] Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Piracy bro lol there's apples and oranges but that's skateboards and dinosaurs.

Even with your point being valid there's tremendous value for society for making somethings as hard as possible.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

sure, but people will find a way.

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Do we know in this case whether or not the gun was even kept in a safe?