this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
754 points (95.8% liked)

Greentext

4343 readers
1179 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 94 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Let's crunch the numbers, would it be financially sensible to pay for m to f transition of Employees, so you can pay them less in the long run?

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mandatory MTF transition as a job requirement on the horizon.

[–] odium@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

Maga hats say this unironically. It's a Republican scare tactic.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 36 points 3 months ago

With 27% pay cut and the employee having a 3000/month salary and them working a decade in most cases yes

[–] SirBucksworth@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

„So John… Listen. We‘re not enough revenue to pay you your regular salary. Either you cut off your d*ck, or we‘ll have to cut you off“

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like that cutting his Pay as man is no option whatsoever

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 11 points 3 months ago

Now you're getting it!