391
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by carrylex@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

Template

Source - The colors of the grids represent CO2 emissions

The title is a reference to the 2021 Texas power crisis

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These are not synchronous grids, but some other kind of boundaries. With synchronous grids the US should be split to only 3 zones, and most of Europe would be colored the same. So I think the kind of map you used is not the best for this joke.

World map of all synchronous grids:

From the website it sounds like that is a map of electric companies or something like that. So this map is not directly related to the Texas crisis. Most of these companies share electricity between each other.

Tom Scott video about synchronous grids: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bij-JjzCa7o

More info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_area_synchronous_grid

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

I think the main point here is that it's a map of CO2 production, not that the american electrical grid is split.

[-] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

The part about the texas crisis made me think it's about why the USA is not a single grid, while Europe is one.

Iirc one big reason made the crisis that severe was their grid is separate, so they couldn't buy electricity from other states.

Also if that's the case than using screenshots from that webside is quite misleading. That site uses live data, so if the 2 screenshots were taken at the same time, one of the continents was at night, so solar panels were not working... An avarege or aggregate map should be used, not live data

[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure how it works in Europe, but power grids being privatized is a big issue in USA. It's essentially a monopoly where one company owns and operates the grids in one or a few states. There's no incentive to maintain the grid because there's no competition and they receive government funding whenever a crisis like this occurs. It's cheaper to just eat the fines than it is to buy electricity from neighboring states.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

because there's no competition

I think competition is not part of problem here. Privatization is.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Iirc one big reason made the crisis that severe was their grid is separate, so they couldn't buy electricity from other states.

There was video on Practical Engieneering about this. They could and did until power line protection tripped.

[-] Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks for leading me down the electric grid rabbit hole!

[-] uis@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

I like how there is this giant Russian-Belorussian-Georgian-Azerbajanian-Kaxah-Uzbeki-Tajikistans-Kirgizian grid.

Who said something about USSA being "too big"?

[-] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The US eastern grid alone generates more than two times electricity than the former SU grid, and they are both dwarves compared to the chinese one. What do you mean, what is the point of your comment? Most of russia is just taiga forest, it's big, but doesn't need electricity.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Most of russia is just taiga forest, it's big, but doesn't need electricity.

There are lots of small cities and villages in that taiga. They require some wires anyway.

Similar argument can be made about US.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I don't see how your post refutes his? Russia is big, but it's sparsely populated, especially anywhere east of Moscow until you get to Vladivostok. Countries other than Russia in their grid equally if not more so sparsely populated. Top that with disparities in Quality of Life between the two grids, and you find the larger one using less power because it's services less clients who use less electricity.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago
[-] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

The current population density of U.S. in 2024 is 34.77 people per square kilometer

https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/USA/united-states/population-density

The current population density of Russia in 2024 is 8.42 people per square kilometer

https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/RUS/russia/population-density

Siberia is HUGE compared to anything.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Siberia is HUGE compared to anything.

Yes. And USA says "no, we are too big for unified grid and functioning railway, and density is soooo low".

[-] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What do you mean, what is the point of your comment?

Thank you for finally replying my question. Not everyone living in amerika, and we don't know who said something about USSA being “too big”? I have no idea who said that because you are paraphrasing something from your US based bubble. Do we have US defaultism here on lemmy?

What is even USSA, I thought you mistyped USSR... There are a lot of tankies here, I thought we are debating about the Soviet Union again.

Oh and your comparison, it seems my reply was correct. The US grid is by far "bigger" than this former SU grid, but not in geometrical mean,

[-] MHanak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Who said something about USSA being "too big"?

We call this copium

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
391 points (95.2% liked)

memes

9644 readers
2262 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS