this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
16 points (69.0% liked)
Privacy
31931 readers
740 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That guy also told people to use google android instead of graphene a few years ago
No he didn't, this is misinformation. Henry from Techlore explained that he was switching back to stock Android, mainly to take advantage of the Google Advanced Protection Program. The description of the video literally reads:
In the final section of the video he very clearly explains that this is his personal choice and that he is NOT recommending people copy him. He said this is an objectively bad decision for some threat models and that he was only doing it to get ahead of the curve when it came to potential security issues in the future.
What was his rationale for recommending stock Android over graphene?
better "security" if I remember correctly
Not sure if I buy that explanation, it's rough to say AOSP is more secure then graphene.
If they had said trusting Google is necessary anyway, so you might as well trust them for the software and the hardware, and not introduce any extra parties. That's a reasonable thing to say. At least that would be an interesting and defensible argument.
I think because he sold out and i have seen other spyuber suggest some watered down bullshit. But if there is a good reason, it would be good to know.
I explained it here. The person you are replying to is just straight up lying about the video in question.
It doesn't matter theyre all compromised.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24833831-cellebrite-android-document-april-2024
how does that link prove your point?
I dont really have a point if I did its probably dont use either android or iOS.
aint newer iphones and pixels "apparently" can't be unlocked by that tool?
Did you not read the slides