348
Texas sues Biden administration to limit teenage access to birth control
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
348 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19138 readers
3354 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Voter suppression also includes telling people that voting doesn't matter, and that "both sides are exactly the same".
If multimillion-dollar political campaigns can't generate more enthusiasm for voting than the "It doesn't matter" crowd can suppress it then the politics are bad.
Don't flatter yourself/them, inaction is infinitely easier than action. I don't think the "don't vote" crowd is good at suppression, I think they're just dumb and lazy.
As opposed to the "smart and proactive" people who vote once every four years and pat themselves on the back for a job well done?
I've been doing that my entire life, but politics sure do seem worse now, don't they?
Worse than what? Then the 60s? The 70s?
Go ahead and withhold your vote, I'm sure that will work out great. Everyone knows the Overton window shifts towards the people who don't vote or participate in elections. The Republicans have shifted further and further right because the neo-nazis and alt-right fuckwads and gamer-gate idiots all banded together and simply didn't vote.
Worse than they were when you started voting.
Maybe instead of blaming the nonvoters, you could take a minute to understand their motivations so that you might be able to better convince them otherwise?
Dunno, just seems reasonable to me.
I understand their motivations, but their methods demonstrably and historically do not work, and actively harm the causes they care about. So again, go for it, I'm sure it will work out great. The other side has made progress by doing the exact opposite, and feminists famously campaigned to be able to vote just for some disenfranchised young people to realize the true path to change is...nothing.
So reasonable lol
Again, and please, please listen to me this time.
I'm not telling you or anyone not to vote.
I'm begging you to consider what arguments or incentives will actually be effective at convincing nonvoters to vote.
This smarmy attitude and the reflexive dismissal of nonvoters as people who cannot be helped is counterproductive at best. Risking the further alienation of the people you're trying to get on your side just to satisfy some need to feel morally superior.
You can't reason people out of positions they didn't reason themselves into. Pointing out that the literally opposite strategy by the GOP got us here and that it is not grounded in reality is not some "smarmy" attitude lol
I didn't say anything about reason, this is rhetoric we're talling about, and denying the reality that people don't like being talked down to isn't going to win friends or influence people.