17
Four key questions still loom over the Trump shooting
(www.motherjones.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
17 points (75.8% liked)
politics
19138 readers
3354 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Searching for political leaders to attack sounds pretty political to me.
Not really. It’s fame seeking. He wanted attention or to commit suicide by cop. It could’ve been anyone important.
Got any evidence?
Not the person you asked, and I don't agree with the person you asked, however the article does mention some circumstantial evidence.
Crooks was researching depression disorder which suggests he may very well have been depressed which could suggest suicidal. Since he was looking up information about both candidates, it suggests he was less concerned about which candidate shot as he was with which offered the better opportunity for success. Recent assassinations and attempted assassinations have involved shooters that were not acting out of a desire for political change, but for some other reason. Take Reagan's shooter, John Hinckley, for example. He shot Reagan because he thought it would impress Jodie Foster and she'd fall in love with him. Or former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's shooter who killed him over a grudge he had against the church Abe was associated with.
It is clearly too soon to say what his motive was, and we may never really know. It is also far to soon to dismiss any reasonable motive until there is evidence to do so.
Would the government release information about it being for political change, if it was?
If he had written a suicide note calling for action, would the government ever let us read it?
does a web search of Trump and Biden suggest is wasn’t political because two parties were searched?
does being depressed and wanting to die in a way that would be noticed automatically make it not motivated by politics?
IMO: No, to all the above.
Unless a non-biased party comes in to document this, with full access, I’m never going to fully trust what the government says about him. Regardless of the political party in charge, none of them really want this to start being a thing that happens regularly.
No evidence of planned suicide.