this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
810 points (99.5% liked)
People Twitter
5230 readers
405 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He wants to be Ceaser, so we all know where this is headed.
https://mashable.com/article/mark-zuckerberg-augustus-caesar-comparison
This is such a weak take. Julius Caesar was a really terrible person in many, many ways. He was basically Donald Trump, if Trump were also an extremely accomplished statesman and military commander. But to just flat-out state he's the worst of the Caesars? We're talking about a dynasty that also had Nero and Caligula. There's an argument to be made for Julius because of the fact that he established the whole thing and caused the downfall of the Republic. But that argument actually needs to be made, not just asserted. Or at the least, couch your comments with words like "possible" or "maybe".
But also, wtf Zuck? How is Augustus the most fascinating? I'm deeply suspicious of anyone who doesn't find Julius the most interesting.
It's awesome to see that the really smart people came over from Reddit. I was hoping someone knew their Roman history.
I do love how many autocratic regimes had "X years of peace" only because fighting the wars conquering additional land and wars with less powerful or small nations/tribes during that time don't seem to count
https://www.workingclassicists.com/post/the-antiquity-to-alt-right-pipeline
Zuckerberg getting high on his own supply.