this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
348 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4738 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

it’s not based in science, it’s based in ideology.

Accidentally telling on himself. Bigoted anti-scientific demagoguery is all of what he does.

Hurting real people based on imaginary dangers and arbitrary traditions is 100% of where this pathetic homunculus gets his power and 100% of what he uses it for.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait, is it really not clear from that context that he believes it's the gender affirming care that is not scientific but ideological? Or are you just not clearly saying it's a projection?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I'm saying that he's clearly projecting but that it's not clear whether or not he's self-aware enough to notice it himself

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

One problem is that he either doesn't know or doesn't care that "gender affirming care" doesn't automatically mean "surgery." Medical guidelines say that should be limited to 18 years or older, but of course he talks about chopping children's penises off.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Oh, make no mistake about it, he's an idiot who is at best pandering to a base. It just wasn't clear if the other poster was calling him out for projection, or if they couldn't parse what he said.