this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
31 points (72.5% liked)

Lemmy

12524 readers
9 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sad to see almost none of the devs, from
Apollor (ChristianSelig), RIF (u/talklittle), Infinity (u/Hostilenemy),
Boost (rmayayo), BaconReader, to Relay (u/DBrady), etc. are not considering Lemmy at all.

I know these were hobbies but by atleast developing it for some time just to make transition for your audience to Lemmy easier would have gone a long way!

@lemmy @LemmyDev Lemmy will remain a niche platform if not enough people switch to it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] li10@feddit.uk 79 points 1 year ago (19 children)

I really don’t think they owe people a Lemmy App. Hell, this platform might even be dead in a couple of months.

Lots of people are making Lemmy apps, so there’s no real need for them to make one as well. The entire platform is a work in progress and there are a number of apps available, so just be patient and eventually they’ll be refined and ready.

[–] ddnomad@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

We are one centralised and pretty Reddit alternative away from people flocking to it.

As swanky as it sounds, I doubt fediverse with all its quirks, bugs, instability, confusion etc. will be able to sustain or even gain mass adoption.

I want this to be false, but we have Mastodon as an example and it ain’t getting the traction it needs to replace or even properly compete with Twitter. Especially not once BlueSky opens up, assuming it will happen.

[–] wernsting@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What makes you say Mastodon isn’t getting any traction? To me https://mastodon-analytics.com tells a different story.

I agree a well thought out centralised Reddit alternative could swoop in, but I’m in no hurry to look at anything other than Fediverse alternatives. I see no compelling reason to.

The active user chart on that site shows a spike after Twitter was sold and then a 50% decline and a flat line after.

It's not bad, but doesn't seem to be growing.

[–] ddnomad@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Judging by user count alone is deceiving, in my opinion. We need to look at how many “big Twitter personas / companies” are moving to Mastodon, because they are the ones generating content and increasing traction.

As it is right now, I only see some people creating Mastodon accounts and posting 1:1 with what they still post on Twitter. This is not enough.

But at the same time, all migrations take time and we will only be able to determine a “winner” after months if not years of this process taking place.

I’m crossing my fingers and hoping for the best still.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Big twitter personas and companies is the enshittification that is trying to be avoided. The less of that and the more of regular people the better.

Why exactly would anyone want companies to advertise to them? This seems like only a bad thing to me.

Quadrupling the daily active user to 1.1-1.2M is so far so good. I don't know how different your story is but that is barely 0.5% that of Twitter still.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)