61
submitted 3 months ago by swooosh@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

We are changing our system. We settled on git (but are open for alternatives) as long as we can selfhost it on our own machines.

Specs

Must have

  • hosted on promise
  • reliabile
  • unlikely to be discontinued in the next >5 years
  • for a group of at least 20 people

Plus

  • gui / windows integration
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] antonionardella@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

I can vouch for Forgejo

https://forgejo.org/

Easy to set up, has a website GUI like Github/GitLab you can use git GUIs with it

https://codeberg.org runs on Forgejo

[-] swooosh@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Thank you! That would be my go to for my own projects as well. As far as I know they don't want company sponsorship. I am unsure about sustainability

[-] JASN_DE@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I am unsure about sustainability

In what regard?

[-] swooosh@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

That the project will be developed in a year or two

[-] ijhoo@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

Maybe check how long it is already going, so it can give you some confidence. Forgejo is a fork of gitea, which is a fork of gogs.

Also, codeberg, a nonprofit from Germany, is supporting development.

https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/

The codebase history of Forgejo and its predecessors predates Codeberg. However, since 2022, Codeberg is backing the development of Forgejo as an umbrella organization.

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 7 points 3 months ago

Forgejo is leading the federated git initiative

[-] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Just to give credit where credit is due, git federation is a Forgefed Initiative

Forgejo is implementing it in their platform.

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

Sure, they are the same people

[-] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Any evidence of that? Genuinely curious as I can't really find anything about them being by the same people and forgefed started as mailed-based prior to forgejo existing.

edit: seems like they are funded by different organizations and the main contributors to forgefed never worked on forgejo, they worked on vervis though.

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I believe it was this issue that made me think this way

[-] Nicarlo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’ve been looking at gitea because of its gitops capabilities that seem to be pretty much on par with github actions. Do you know if forgejo has something similar? There seems to be a lack of documentation in that area. This has been my only reason for not moving to forgejo but im hoping im wrong and just missed some documentation.

EDIT: Thank you all who provided some additional insights that I was missing. I'll take the leap and give forgejo a try!

[-] seang96@spgrn.com 4 points 3 months ago

There are forejo runners and they seem compatible with a bunch of github actions. I created one that builds a docker image and publishes it on the repo.

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago

Forgejo actions is basically GitHub actions. The difference in my ci scripts is a single line and you can even use GitHub action templates or whatever they're called.

You just need to add some runners to your server, which is pretty easily doable by just using some docker container and deploying that multiple times

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Forgejo actions is basically GitHub actions

That's the problem. GH actions su-huck.

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago

In what way? Works for me

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Forgejo is a fork of gitea, and it only became a hard fork earlier this year, so if gitea does something, forgejo probably does it as well.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
61 points (95.5% liked)

Selfhosted

39937 readers
367 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS