this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
715 points (87.0% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3866 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called "Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji".

F that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 100 points 3 months ago (26 children)

We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji. These are also brands that are heavily ingrained in our culture. Probably even more so than Bitcoin.

Or we accept that brands like Bitcoin shouldn’t use emoji as a marketing tool.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Probably even more so

probably? shitcoin isn't even in the same ~~ballpark~~ universe as something like McDonald's or Pepsi.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji

bitcoin is not a company.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Also not a brand, in the trademark sense

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

🍟 <<< Only one brand sells French fries / Chips in this format. And it's the super-size format.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unicode Consortium decide which emoji should be included. It’s up to each vendor themselves to come up with how they should look like. I don’t think Unicode Consortium explicitly state it must look like McDonald’s fries.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No. But the description of the Emoji is French Fries in a red carton.

Now I can't be absolutely certain only McDonald's sells french fries in a red carton, nor do I know if red french fry cartons are trademarked (answers to these questions evaded simple websearches) but I have never seen french fries sold in red cartons outside of McDonald's.

If you do find non-McDonald's french fries sold in a red carton, please point them out.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Red carton is chosen because that’s how it’s commonly depicted in cartoon images.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=french+fries+cartoon&t=h_&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

The red and white stripes are the generic 50's era diner fries. Flat red was introduced by McDonald's in the 1980s extra-large and super-size cartons. (Before that McDonald's fries were sold in white waxed-paper envelopes.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At KFC they’re in a red plastic box of the same format. Can’t buy them cuz of reusable packaging laws in France, but that’s what I thought first when I saw this emoji

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

That's fair. I had forgotten KFC made their own version of fries and boxed them in red.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Mastercard emoji

💳

[–] Aolley@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Since when is Bitcoin a brand lmao? I'm really struggling to see how it is comparable to McDonald's or Windows. Having a logo does not make you a corporation

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 28 points 3 months ago

The Bitcoin logo is the brand. Corporations like exchanges use this brand to market their services.

load more comments (18 replies)