453
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by SentientFishbowl@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I'm a little bit underwhelmed, I thought that based off the fact so many people seem to make using this distro their personality I expected... well, more I guess?

Once the basic stuff is set-up, like wifi, a few basic packages, a desktop environment/window manager, and a bit of desktop environment and terminal customisation, then that's it. Nothing special, just a Linux distribution with less default programs and occasionally having to look up how to install a hardware driver or something if you need to use bluetooth for the first time or something like that.

Am I missing something? How can I make using Arch Linux my personality when once it's set up it's just like any other computer?

What exactly is it that people obsess over? The desktop environment and terminal customisation? Setting up NetworkManager with nmcli? Using Vim to edit a .conf file?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] h_ramus@lemm.ee 121 points 1 month ago

Didn't bother going through the hoops and installed EndeavourOS which is arch-based with some additional default applications.

For me, the best thing of Arch isn't the distribution but the Arch wiki. An impressive piece of documentation.

[-] SentientFishbowl@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 month ago

Arch wiki is superb, couldn't have installed or configured Arch without it.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

Which btw is the reason many people ended up with Archlinux... after the x-th time looking up some configuration issues on another distro and landing there.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago

And the Arch User Repository is really handy when you need some more users.

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 month ago

That's not a typo but a jest to the security implications, isn't it?

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

It was a joke on the dual meaning of "user repository" which I didn't think about that deeply but that would have been smart.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Arch build system is just as impressive IMO. I've written Debian and redhat packages for at least two decades and Arch packaging is just so much easier to handle. The associated tooling for creating and managing build chroots is excellent as well.

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 2 points 1 month ago

That's the main reason my software is in the AUR but nowhere else. I tried to make a deb package and failed so many times so I just gave up.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

EndeavorOS is essentially Arch with a gui installer and a few optional pre-installed packages.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, wiki and community are top notch!

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
453 points (94.0% liked)

Linux

47293 readers
757 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS