this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
111 points (93.0% liked)

politics

19229 readers
2336 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why?

Biden wanted to codify Trump's border policies. It was only a few months ago Biden wouldn't stop talking about it

And sure trump would have been worse, but the alternative matters. Kamala doesn't have that baggage.

The only thing that would be surprising is if any demographic suffered losses from replacing Joe.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I have heard, but not sure about accuracy, that Latinos who are already here in the US support shutting down the border as it's less competition and/or draws less attention from racisits persicuting all lationos regarless of immigration status. Kinda like a "got mine, fuck you" mentality which is very GOP.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago

Pulling the ladder up behind them is very conservative/boomerish indeed :/

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Some do, especially when you're including the grandkids of wealthy Cubans who have never set foot outside the US.

But when the actions are the same, the tone matters less.

By matching trump on border policy, it lets a significant amount feel that they can support trump because "both parties are the same" on that topic.

It doesn't mean a gain for Democrats, just more people that don't feel obligated to stop trump.

It validates republican nonsense, and makes voters think maybe they were right about other stuff too. Just a massive fumble anyway you look at it.

I mean, giving the president that power would have almost guaranteed Republicans always used it, so when a Dem would get office, they'd all try to cross then. Giving Republicans ammunition for the next election and making it more likely even Dems shut the border down.

But Biden thought short term it would help him.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

What makes you think Latino's don’t like Trump’s border policies? Clearly, there is not a single representative Latino, but there’s certainly a significant portion that likes closed borders.