45
The race to become the world’s first document-free airport | CNN
(edition.cnn.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
45 points (94.1% liked)
News
22895 readers
4417 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Oh no, I don't want that. Paper documents have a chain of custody and can be directly verified in a manner that is transparent to both the document holder and the border agent.
This AI vision shit is dark magic even to the people that deploy it. Not good.
"dark magic" is the wrong term here because it's not magic dark or not, "black box" would be more apt
Also, I just wanted the paper documents to be digitized for easy carry on my phone, this biometric AI crap is going way too far
It's viewed as magic, and referred to in magical terms. But yes most neural nets/machine learning/vectored transforms are black boxes.
And yes, the paper documents being referenced by a direct scan/rfid hashed value or other similar digital document is still within the chain of custody.
I think my issue is I'm not in direct possession of my ID with a system like this. Too many times the image recognition has been wrong for me to trust something like this.
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2023/04/08/police-artificial-intelligence-facial-recognition-clearview-ai-social-media
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/police-facial-recognition-technology-cant-tell-black-people-apart/
And these systems are too susceptible to abuse, which especially is a concern in the Emirates and similar governments
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/06/cop-busted-for-unauthorized-use-of-clearview-ai-facial-recognition-resigns/
My biggest concern with all of this is more data storage and privacy. I'm not necessarily opposed to biometric identity verification, because realistically this is the direction the world is heading and it probably is the best way to securely and accurately identify individuals. What I do caution is how this data can possibly be stolen, manipulated, and/or sold. Marketing companies and malicious actors would be salivating over that data, and all it takes is one fuck up to turn a reasonable identity program into a dystopian nightmare. The lighter/more benign possibility being that you just get bombarded with ads, the worse being some douche in an windowless office insinuating your propensity for crime and making life difficult.