Firefox

17898 readers

46 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

152

EFF Says Mozilla's PPA is better than Google's Solution (www.fastcompany.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by astro_ray@lemdro.id to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mozilla’s system only measures the success rate of ads—it doesn’t help companies target those ads—and it’s less susceptible to abuse, EFF’s Lena Cohen told @FastCompany@flipboard.com. “It’s much more privacy-preserving than Google’s version of the same feature.”

https://mastodon.social/@eff/112922761259324925

Privacy experts say the new toggle is mostly harmless, but Firefox users saw it as a betrayal.

“They made this technology for advertisers, specifically,” says Jonah Aragon, founder of the Privacy Guides website. “There’s no direct benefit to the user in creating this. It’s software that only serves a party other than the user.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Why don't you just move to another country if you don't like it here?"

"I say this as a true patriot."

There's your issue.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Their argument was not that it's good because people can use Chrome - the remark about Chrome was a sarcastic side note that is not needed to support the argument that it's not clear what the issue is with an anonymous counter.

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My issue was with that type of sarcasm, which is why I responded with a similarly dismissive sarcastic remark.

Dismissing people's complaints by saying "you can go use something else/move someplace else" is unhelpful and used to negate their complaints without ever having to address their source.

I doubt many people see an anonymous counter as a huge problem itself, I don't. The point is that this is a first step in a direction we don't want to see the software go. If you don't push back against these things from the moment they show up, they will continue to slowly inch in that direction until you end up in a nightmare like Chrome or Edge.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

My issue was with that type of sarcasm, which is why I responded with a similarly dismissive sarcastic remark.

That's fair enough.