this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
257 points (92.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54565 readers
382 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

from her telegram

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] driving_crooner 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

To this day I still don’t understand what “100% dragon” means.

Is it like they’re pure breads? Are there literally no other animals? Is it some sort of 90’s style emphatic like “maximum overdrive 100% turbo dragon”?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm still stuck on "science-based"

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean I “get it” I think? It’s like trying to make a science-based time travel movie. You operate with strict rules and try to keep grounded in our current reality where possible. Some theoretical concepts at least feel more “realistic” than others.

Game of Thrones tried to be somewhat grounded compared to say, Warcraft which is very high fantasy with a lot less basis in reality.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

We call that "science fiction", not 100% science-based

[–] driving_crooner 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Common mistake, is not 100% science based, is science based, 100% dragon.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Damn, you're right. It makes total sense now.

BTW I love your username. If only there were some way to make money off it!

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You really do not see the distinction I’m drawing?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, I get what you're saying, I'm just saying that the name for the thing you're describing, where some fantastical premise is extended logically using more realistic science, is "science fiction".

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Dude no shit come on. I don’t think dragons are based in reality. They don’t exist. What are you trying to say? That I don’t understand what science fiction is?

You can go “dragons are magical indestructible things that breathe fire because hand waves” or you can try to go “if dragons are real (which they aren’t because apparently I need to state this) this is an approximation of how they’d biologically work.”

These are different things. I can’t believe I’m having to write this out.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

It’s not about the degree of genetic hybridization but rather what’s playable. 100% dragon MMO means there’s only dragons, no other playable creatures. Pretty straightforward, no?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wondered how long it would take for someone to notice lol