Data Is Beautiful

6953 readers

1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

satur@lemmy.ml

otter@lemmy.ca

466

Presidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote” (mbin.grits.dev)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.

[–] Klaymore@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren't shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space

[–] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They could've done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.

[–] Mojave@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Looks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic

[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn't actually have to be beautiful.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also, sometimes it say "won" or lost" behind the candidates, sometimes there is an asterisk, but for many entries, there is no information who won and who lost?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 4 months ago

The asterisk is explained up top, and they only indicate who won when it is backwards from the popular vote total.