this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
351 points (89.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35919 readers
1572 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know MediaBiasFactCheck is not a be-all-end-all to truth/bias in media, but I find it to be a useful resource.

It makes sense to downvote it in posts that have great discussion -- let the content rise up so people can have discussions with humans, sure.

But sometimes I see it getting downvoted when it's the only comment there. Which does nothing, unless a reader has rules that automatically hide downvoted comments (but a reader would be able to expand the comment anyways...so really no difference).

What's the point of downvoting? My only guess is that there's people who are salty about something it said about some source they like. Yet I don't see anyone providing an alternative to MediaBiasFactCheck...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What client do you use? It looks fine in Thunder. (I agree it's spammy in general, but not because of the formatting.)

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's broken on Eternity as well, it looks like thisScreenshot_20240809_023020_Eternity

[–] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if other spoiler tags work in Eternity or if there's something about the way this bot posts that breaks it.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Looking at the buttons that they give me when I'm commenting it looks like it does support spoilers when done in the >!text!< syntax, but the other alternative version definitely took over.

I've never seen the ::: spoiler text ::: version work

[–] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's partly Lemmy's fault for using a custom spoiler syntax. But yeah it sounds like Eternity doesn't support it yet.

That said, there was an issue in their repo just recently closed, so it sounds like support is coming!

https://codeberg.org/Bazsalanszky/Eternity/issues/172

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

That's great to hear, I love eternity as a client because none of the other ones that I've tried so far have come close to what I'm looking for in a UI and I like the ability to block comments and posts by specific keywords, it really helps when the entire platform as a whole becomes hyper focused on one subject because I can just add that subject to the block list and filter out the flood

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm using Sync and this is how it looks:

[–] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Like I commented above, I wonder if other spoiler tags work in Sync or if there's something about the way this bot posts that breaks it.