483
submitted 2 months ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/astronomy@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cosmicrose@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

This picture is inaccurate, Pluto is actually much farther away.

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No it's just really small

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Telephoto shot, using a 1e50 mm lens.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

if anyone wants to do the math, how far away from the sun would the camera have needed to be to take such a photo?

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Apparent scale is inverse linear, i.e., proportional to 1 / distance. If we want the apparent scale of two objects to be about 90% accurate to their actual relative scale, their relative distances to the camera can't be more than 10% different. Pluto being 40-ish astronomical from Earth, you'd want to shoot from about 400 AU. Voyager I should be in prime position circa 2140.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Probably not necessary to use a lens so long it can reach distant galaxies!

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
483 points (99.0% liked)

Astronomy

3973 readers
26 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS