this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
505 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39110 readers
3440 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] w00tabaga@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insulin is worse though because it’s not like it’s a drug that had to be developed and has a billion dollars or more to develop. The case with insulin is blatant price gouging.

This pill, this doesn’t mean it should be as cheap as insulin as the two drugs aren’t equals. It can be priced fairly and still be expensive, we don’t know the economics behind it. Being cheap =/= fair pricing all the time. Like buying a better product that took more to make.

This could still be outrageously priced obviously, but comparing it to insulin is apples to oranges.

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it doesn't look very advanced or hard to make honestly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOH1996

[–] wintersummerland@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the indicator in the article that the compound is trivial to produce?

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

its structure, it's like 4 steps from widely available building blocks, all routine things (amide couplings, one palladium coupling or SNAr)

source: me, i'm an organic chemist

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

depending on how you count, even less than 4 steps all starting materials are commercially available and probably pretty cheap

i'm not gonna talk down a molecule that's easy to make, but there may be room for modifications, should it be discovered that these are beneficial. this may or may not make synthesis a little bit harder or more expensive but at any rate not impossible