Privacy

31951 readers

479 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

668

So, this cookie alert on theverge.com is both refreshingly honest and depressingly disturbing (lemmy.radio)

submitted 3 months ago by vk6flab@lemmy.radio to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A cookie notice that seeks permission to share your details with "848 of our partners" and "actively scan device details for identification".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] void_vortex@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I used to rely on Consent-O-Matic a lot, but I'm somewhat uncomfortable by the fact that the extension has full access to all web page content. I mean I understand why, but I'm still uncomfortable with it. In the end I ended up uninstalling it because it broke some sites so that they wouldn't load at all, or got stuck into an infinite reload loop. On majority of cases it works alright though.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yea, every extension has full access to any website, if you not make use of a whitelist/blacklist.

[–] void_vortex@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some extensions, such as SponsorBlock for YouTube actually limit themselves so they can only operate when the browser is on youtube.com. This can be declared in the extension manifest. It's a separate permission to access data on all web sites vs. access data on a specific website.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Not helpful when something like Consent-o-matic needs to operate on every possible website with a cookie banner.

I have had the same concerns, since watching it click through things faster than I can see is scary. Maybe some day someone sneaks in a cookie banner detector that activates on banking pages to steal your money? uBlock Origin has similar risks, but at least it's not actively controlling browser inputs.