this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1237 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

60073 readers
2964 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1237
Justice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: report (nypost.com)
submitted 4 months ago by Gsus4@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
247 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So they're breaking up Google but giving Intel more free money after it cut 15k jobs?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Google also cut 12000 jobs in Jan 2023, but it does not have an AMD or Nvidia to kick its ass in search when it fucks up.

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Intel is a near monopoly and it controls the physical hardware that runs the entire universe with the exception of mobile devices and embedded.

If you're going to break anyone up that's who I would go for first but because of the pipe dream of making computer chips in 'Murica these idiot politicians keep propping up Intel's Wall Street investors while its employees get fucked over.

At the very least the x86 duopoly has to end. It's not only legal but kept the way it is because of legal contracts. The courts need to declare them void because their enforcement leads to the violation of antitrust laws.

[–] nic547@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

IFS is struggling to compete against TSMC, Datacenter is bleeding and loosing Customers to AMD, Ampere. Microsoft, NVIDIA and Google are also working on ARM server CPUs. Client Computing Group is loosing marketshare to Apple and AMD, with Qualcomm also recently entering the ring. They had to kill Optane, sell their NAND business, they're not really relevant in GPU, have to IPO Altera again to get some cash and Mobileye already had to be IPOd again.

Clearly the CPU market didn't need intervention to get competitive again, Intel didn't have the power to prevent others from competing in the market and as soon as they got complacent others got ready.

Relying on TSMC as the exclusive manufacturer for bleeding edge semiconductors would be insane. We need Intel and Samsung to remain competitive.

At the very least the x86 duopoly has to end.

AMD, Intel and Centaur/VIA have x86 licensees. ARM exists, RISC-V is gaining traction - No need to implement all the legacy baggage of x86 when you can start with something a little bit more current.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

How is this related?