446
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

And she was right because if people really cared they'd protest until it stops and they don't so they passively consent.

[-] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I protested. I flew to El Paso to the Clint border station where they had the kids in cells and cages at gunpoint under the threat of death, and I protested. The US intelligence community had let them know that I was coming and they had an entire team of killers with M4s trying to get me to move incorrectly because, as they charged me in court, anything over 3 lb can be used as a lethal weapon and I could have killed them all. I refused to take the bait and had reporters there recording. I was arrested and when I was brought into the station I was assaulted while wearing cuffs by border patrol agent Manuel Alvarez IV. He was upset that I was walking too slowly after they took away my cane.

Manuel Alvarez IV then worked with FBI agent Issac Frost and FBI agent Shannon Enochs to charge me with a federal crime because in theory I could have atomized their bulletproof door with a crowbar and caused $100,000 or more of damage, if only I wasn't just peacefully protesting wild loudly stating on public property in an open area that I was there to peacefully protest and that I was unarmed (and also severely physically disabled from being a thrice deployed veteran). FBI agents Issac Frost and FBI agent Shannon Enochs literally edited out that part of the tape when they prosecuted me. Again, there are no consequences for this. Fortunately, even though I am a disabled veteran with memory issues I had a decent memory of what had happened years prior by the time I was prosecuted and notified my lawyer that they had modified the tape.

This is one of the only reasons why I didn't spend my life in jail.

The U.S. federal government has a 95% to 98% success rate with their prosecutions. I was found not guilty. The case is available online if you Google Manuel Alvarez IV. Long story short attorneys volunteered to take my case for free and pushed it as far as they could, but the government claimed immunity. Apparently they can just do this and this is approved by judges and the law. This isn't an accident. They wrote this down on paper. I don't understand. I'm just a disabled veteran trying to uphold our constitution.

Border patrol and the FBI are currently ran by and employs the people who were illegally holding children at gunpoint, and the agents who falsify evidence in order to put innocent veterans in jail. Many parts of their actions have been found to be illegal, but more importantly were hugely an obviously immoral. These are the people who are now the federal employees telling us we need to listen to them.

Manuel Alvarez IV FBI agent Shannon Enochs FBI agent Issac Frost

The department of veterans affairs told me that the polyps growing in my face are terminal because I can't have a third polypectomy. That's just the results of going to war and burn pits. I will be dead and these guys will be running the US government.

Congratulations FBI, you won in the long run as you always do.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I applaud your bravery, and I'm sorry you were treated so poorly by a government you gave everything to. You can be proud that you stand on the right side of history, and fought for ethical treatment of your fellow humans. I hope you are able to get treatment and recover from your polyps.

When all that went down I attended a large protest in my area but wasn't harassed and persecuted by the feds like you were.

[-] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

You're a fucking hero, man! That's honestly more than I've ever done against state violence and imperialism. I mean it.

[-] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I really appreciate it. It didn't help anything though. I was a career federal employee before that. I really thought the system was full of people trying to do good. What I was confronted with changed everything.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I believe you, btw, but I wanted to read the court filings and googling "Manuel alvarez IV" just brings up a court case against 3M and a mention as a grandchild in an obituary.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If it's federal you probably need to search Pacer for the court filings.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And she was right because if people really cared they’d protest until it stops and they don’t so they passively consent.

  • There were massive protests.
  • I'm confident that Melania Trump was proudly showcasing her own apathy, not ironically advocating for protest against her husband or making a statement about how the opposition doesn't care enough.
[-] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I didn't remember these protests, thanks for refreshing my memory! 🙏

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
446 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4592 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS