54
submitted 2 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 months ago

Americans love to role play at having a democracy, but when push comes to shove the public is never consulted about such monumental decisions like ending human civilization.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Wait sorry, Palantir saying this somehow reflects upon the US? Like I’m not saying that the US is good or bad but Palantir is definitely fucking bad

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly yeah, a fascist billionaire's policy thinktank trying to help gin up a war is reflective of US policy, especially US government policy since they help write it.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago

it’s certainly on brand but this isn’t the official policy of any country, it’s a billionaire who owns a defense company trying to gin up business. Again, on brand but acting like this is tantamount to or evidence of the US actually doing these things is kind of silly. It’s Palantir, they aren’t a reputable source of anything other than RFPs.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Government tied "independent" think tanks and NGOs are part of the cycle of consent manufacturing that turns the avarice of billionaire ghouls into government policy. The US government is a bunch of banks and weapons manufacturers stacked on top of each other in a trench coat. A government is not a faction: its a tool, a weapon, it has no intention other than the intention of whoever carries it. This one is in the hands of the ultra wealthy and always has been. The desires of rich fucks to make more money is not separable from the actions of the US government: it always informs it. They start wars and genocides for profit. There is no other heuristic guiding the actions of the US empire because there is no faction other than the bourgeoisie that is allowed to control it.

You might as well say "Sure, the shooter is pulling the trigger, but it would be silly to think that reflects on the intentions of the gun."

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
54 points (83.8% liked)

World News

32288 readers
719 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS