this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
51 points (98.1% liked)

Games

16697 readers
1115 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
51
The state of games publishing: "The era of the generalist indie publisher is over" (www.gamesindustry.biz)
submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The premise of the article's headline is immediately contradicted by one of its first quotes:

"What we’re seeing at the moment are huge changes in the market, where forecasting models haven’t caught up with oversaturation, the impact of subscription services and the prevalence of aggressive discounting. Companies that overstretched during times of plenty now find themselves in a world where more agile companies are moving in and performing better.

"I’m still tremendously excited about the market. There are great games launching all the time, and breakout hits popping off week after week. It’s not that people aren’t buying games – far from it. It’s that the foundations some companies have built their operations upon rely on games selling an unrealistic amount. Many of these companies are still very profitable, which is what makes it even more heartbreaking."

The saturation point is one I can definitely agree with. There's far too much good stuff to play this year.

[–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

The premise of the article's headline is immediately contradicted by one of its first quotes:

I'm not sure I follow what the contradiction is?