this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
2293 points (98.7% liked)

Science Fiction

13567 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's honestly crazy how many people can read Dune and completely misunderstand the themes of the book.

Though to be fair, it sometimes feels like Frank himself didn't fully understand what themes he was going for. Books 1-3 were staunchly "Beware of heroes, charismatic leaders will lead you to evil and despair", then in GEoD, we find that literally the only hope for humanity was millenia of oppression by a totalitarian government.

But either of those two takes is still wildly better than "spice saves the universe" lol

[–] Koffiato@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dune has one of the most complex (and necessarily logical) universe in it. I'm not surprised every reader found different themes more fitting.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dune had no good guys, none at all.

Everyone was out for themselves or their narrow view of what was just and best for humanity from their simplistic and self-centered perspective.

Leto 2 was the exception because he was out for his narrow view of what was best for humanity from his broad, self-centered perspective that still didn't really lead anywhere.

The actual point of the books is that no ideal survives the test of real time, and over time civilization tends to ossify, so we are doomed to catastrophe by our very nature.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

It wasn't the qctual only hope, just the only path Paul and Leto could see, and we know they aren't omniscient