this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
619 points (88.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

30006 readers
366 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
quinten@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
619
If "Master/Slave" terminology in computing sounds bad now, why not change it to "Dom/Sub"? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 4 months ago by Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
458 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology's problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guarantee when the average person hears "master/slave"

This seems like projection... How do you even begin to have this much certainty about what goes on in any head beside your own?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I also think it's weird to hear the word slave in this context (or in the automotive industry where it is also used) and immediately think of black people. What does that say about you and your thought process?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think its weird to even use such a term in a different context to begin with. Its also generally pretty inaccurate. Many such primary/secondary or parent/child relationships in tech exist either for redundancy or for determining priority/sort order, which isn't what a master/slave relationship would do in a slavery scenerio. About the closest equivalent is a manager/worker relationship, which again is more accurate to say manager/worker because it is not a hostile relationship between the worker nodes and the manager node.

So in short:

  1. Master/slave is inaccurate. Inaccurate terminology leads to confusion, and confusion leads to inefficiency and time waste.
  2. Changing from Master/slave to something else is a relatively easy change to make
  3. If there's even a chance that it leads to a more inclusive working environment that's even better!
[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

because it is not a hostile relationship between the worker nodes and the manager node.

Some places I've worked...