181

On Monday, the Democrats approved their 2024 platform, which includes no mention of the death penalty. This year’s platform marks the first time since 2004 the platform has not mentioned the death penalty (the 2008 and 2012 platforms called for making the punishment less arbitrary).

Public support for the death penalty has been gradually declining. A Gallup poll last year found that 65% of Democrats oppose the punishment.

The Democratic National Committee did not respond to an email asking if the party still supports abolishing the death penalty.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240823120531/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/democrats-scrub-death-penalty-campaign-platform_n_66c67a0de4b0b9c7b360296b

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 95 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not huge on my priority list, but why? It's just...bad. Maybe it's popular with too many people in the center.

ETA: How can you have the Central Park 5 represent at the DNC and then do this??

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Honestly, there’s bigger fish to fry (pun only moderately intended).

If we didn’t have war in Ukraine, and war AND genocide in Gaza and two African countries at the moment, and then whatever the hell is happening in Venezuela and ascertaining its ramifications, along with stupid inflation on just what we need to live, and multiple generations locked out of homeownership or possibly even retirement due to a corporate greed-created housing crisis and predatory student loans, and a SCOTUS that is bent on removing the rights of just about anyone who isn’t a straight, white “Christian” man…then yeah, death penalty talk should have been on the table.

But, Harris is a politician, and all politicians have to focus on whichever sound bites can bring over those who are - astonishingly - undecided at this point. It’s naive to think that any candidate who has it “all” will get the nomination. That’s how Hilary got the nomination over Bernie, and it’s how we got Biden as well.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

It blows my mind that anyone could be undecided now, but clearly there are folks out there who simply do not in any way follow the news or put any effort into understanding the candidates or issues until the very last minute.

It's a mindset I simply don't get.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's insane. You think those people just wouldn't vote if they're that uninformed, but nope, there must really be people out there who will vote based on the vibes they're feeling that week or something.

The only way I could see it is if you're a Republican voter who's getting worried about Trump's increasingly unhinged tweeting and speeches. But even then, considering what he's done before, it's hard to believe someone hitting that point now, so late.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago

There are plenty of people out there who live by the "Never Vote Democrat" rule, regardless of not realizing that Democrat policies would probably help them, and Republican actions are why they are bad off now. Party line, do or die. How can you change that?

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

At least then you're a dedicated Republican cult member by this point. But being an undecided voter, now? That's hard for me to wrap my mind around lol.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago

I can't say I understand it either. All I can do is try to suggest to them maybe there's a reason to vote left, even on just a single issue, and perhaps break through the wall of sports politics and apathy. I don't see that as taking a high road, but just trying to win the little battles where it's feasible. Some people are lost, and you find that out really quickly if you can't even have a discussion with them without it getting ugly.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

anyone could be undecided now

One proposes to be “dictator on day one” while other wore a tan suit. Both the same

[-] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago

The President can blanket commute federal death penalty sentences. It's been done in specific cases before:

https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/president-obama-commutes-two-death-sentences

Would just need the some White House lawyers to draw up the paperwork, and it's done for at least one administration. Literally the minimum that could be done.

Most death penalty cases are at the state level, of course. Even if they have Democrats in the governor's office, this power will depend on the individual state constitution.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
181 points (92.9% liked)

News

23297 readers
3471 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS