this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
45 points (95.9% liked)

Death to NATO

1551 readers
79 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Farmer_Heck@lemmygrad.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmygrad.ml
AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
Fissionami@lemmygrad.ml
45
There will be "severe punishment" following Ukraine's incursion into Russia, according to the Russian ambassador to the US (news.sky.com)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml to c/ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Vladimir Putin has "made a decision" and there will be "severe punishment" following Ukraine's incursion into Russia, according to the Russian ambassador to the US.

Mr Putin was clearly frustrated at the Ukrainian incursion, but a ruthless Russian military response was only one option. Ukraine is short of military capability - soldiers and weapons - and it appears that they have deployed up to 10,000 soldiers (probably battle-hardened) into Russian territory. This "fixes" these Ukrainian forces well away from the frontline Russian action in the Donbas.

Mr Putin knows that progress on the frontline will slow when winter arrives, so his forces have perhaps 10 to 12 weeks remaining to achieve the objectives of his so-called Special Military Operation. By focusing on Russian main effort in the Donbas, Mr Putin knows that Ukraine has diluted the forces available to resist the Russian assault towards Pokrovsk, which might enable greater progress in the limited time available.

Once Russia's objectives in the Donbas have been achieved, Mr Putin might consider that he can address the Kursk incursion in slower time.

What could 'severe punishment' mean?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's my thinking as well. I am actually kinda expecting them to do something as they had been responding to attacks on their refineries and looking at the ammount of refinneries, air bases and other things that have been hit recently toghether with the whole Kursk incursion and the west giving green light for the use of their weapons inside Russia, they kinda of are pressed to do what could be the biggest attack since the war started, but I wouldn't be surprised if they just pretend nothing of this happened too and just continue pushing in the east as they may think they will win soon.

But if they do actually do something perhaps they could take the opportunity to do it at the same time as Iran and Yemen, and even others as well, to really show that a red line has been crossed.

[โ€“] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Exactly, Russia always has the option of asymmetric response. The people who need to know will know, while that won't escalate the conflict in the eyes of the general public. For example, this might be part of the response https://apnews.com/article/turkey-russia-patrols-syria-ypg-assad-89fcd22474497bff737b87ae6b214b3e

If US backed rebels get cleared out in Syria, then US bases there will become untenable, and US will lose control over the refineries and food producing regions. The oil that US steals from Syria goes directly to Israel, and losing that would create logistics problems for both.