this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
70 points (92.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
520 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I think those only need 1 test to play with them, and that's because they are regulated by the government. They want people to follow the rules because if they don't it can come down on all of them.

The biggest one of these that I know of is falconry which requires 1 falconry test, 1 hunt test, 1 inspection, and finding a two year sponsor. Falconry is specifically set up to gatekeep as to protect the sport in the USA.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

I'm on board with rules if it involves live animals tbh

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, I have yet to encounter ham gatekeeping beyond "don't broadcast without a licence and callsign". The test itself is all important stuff, as I'm studying for it in Canada.

It's dead because what we're doing right here is an easier way to talk to people around the world. You have to be nerdy enough to love the technology for it's own sake, so that cuts down the pool pretty severely even before the cost and "red tape" come into it.

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How is putting up so many barriers to participation meant to protect the sport?

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Falconry in the US exists as an exclusion from the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Both of these laws make it illegal to disrupt or possess native birds or their parts. Falconers successfully petitioned the government to let them take wild raptors from the wild as long as falconers themselves regulate the participants. If the falconers are not being respectful of the birds it would be incredibly easy to strip their privileges.

In the same sense RC flying is a privilege from the FAA after too many people flew drones into airports and HAM is a privilege from the FCC to keep people from jacking up the airwaves.

That’s interesting, I never knew that! Makes sense though

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Well, the last guy they let have falcon killed a baby black bear & blamed it on a bicyclist…

I’m guessing they needed to sure up their ranks after that nonsense.