this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
201 points (95.1% liked)
linuxmemes
21448 readers
1383 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudo
in Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Vim is extremely feature-rich, and people that think otherwise don't really know how to use vim. Saying vim doesn't have a lot of features is just a meme that isn't true.
Also, the vim plugin for vscode is kind of a joke compared to what vim can do. It's very "surface-level" with minor emulation of some of the common keybinds.
Saying that Vim isn't feature-rich is like saying that a terminal isn't feature-rich. The features are right there, you just have to find them.
Dang. Hot take! I don't think I've heard anyone else say that.
You clearly actually completed VimTutor.
I have several complaints about the VSVim plugin, but it's easily the most feature complete Vim-like plugin I've ever encountered.
I'm trying to pay you a compliment, but I am doing it poorly.
As a legend among my Vim using peers, I can see how VSVim can be frustrating, to someone who truly leverages Vim.
Your annoyance with VSVim outs you as one of the true power users.
Yeah it sounds like you're trying to mock me but it mostly just comes across as confusing. Maybe it's just sarcasm? Hard to tell.
Anyway, it's pretty well-known in the vim community that VSVim is pretty lackluster vim emulation. There are much better examples of vim emulation out there, such as evil for emacs.
It honestly has nothing to do with being a "power user". It's simply false to claim that vscode has more features than vim (which is what the parent comment was claiming), and this should be evident to anyone with more than the most basic, surface-level understanding of vim (more than vimtutor, basically). Vim is a lot more than HJKL and
ciw
.I'm not annoyed with VsVim really since I honestly don't really think about it as it's not all that relevant. I do find it a bit irksome when people make false or misleading claims about vim from a place of ignorance about what it actually is.
It's a strange phenomenon with vim in particular, where many people are exposed to it at their periphery, read some reductive claim about it online, and parrot said claim all over the place as though it were fact. Perhaps the nature of being a tool that most are exposed to but few actually learn.
Not sarcasm. I'm genuinely satisfied with VSCode's Vim emulation, and you're the first person I have heard say otherwise.
I just meant - that means you're using features that most of us aren't.
Fair point about evil mode for Emacs being better, but that requires using Emacs, which I have found un-usable, so far.
There's many very basic features of vim that VsVim does not have (like... almost all command line commands), basic features which regular vim users use all the time.
You seem to think that people using vim emulation is the norm and using vim itself is the exception and unusual... Which is very much not the case. The opposite is true, with VsVim users being a minority. It's relatively novel among vscode users (most just use a mouse and maybe a small handful of built-in shortcuts), whereas vim itself is quite ubiquitous in the Unix world, with many Linux machines even providing it as the default editor. I know many vim and emacs users (including lots that I work with), and maybe 1 VsVim user (honestly not even sure if they do).
!
is supported:https://github.com/VsVim/VsVim/blob/master/Documentation/Supported%20Features.md
It sounds like you haven't tried VsVim in a long be time, or had an unusually bad experience with it.
(Edit: My responses to your other points were my old man energy, and not worth anyone's time, so I removed them.)
Vim's command line, i.e, commands starting with
:
. The vanishingly few it does support are, again, only the most basic, surface-level commands (and some commands aren't even related to their vim counterparts, like:cwindow
, which doesn't open the quick fix list since the extension doesn't support that feature).The last commit to the supported features doc was 5 years ago, so no, it isn't. Seriously, you can't possibly look at that doc and tell me that encompasses even 20% of vim's features. Where's the quick fix list? The location list? The args list? The change list? The jump list? Buffers? Vim-style window management (including vim's tabs)? Tags? Autocommands (no, what it has does not count)? Ftplugins?
ins-completion
? The undo tree? Where's:edit
,:find
,:read [!]
, and:write !
?:cdo
,:argdo
,:bufdo
,:windo
?Compared to what vim can do, it is absolutely a joke.
Holy shit. I would never claim that. Lol.
And I was expanding on my original comment, which was not replying to you, so there you have it.
Makes sense. I only really replied there to help anyone reading along.