7
submitted
1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
by
johnlawrenceaspden@thelemmy.club
to
c/chess@lemmy.ml
In won endgame positions, computers are incredibly good and never miss a trick.
But in positions where they've lost, they tend to play really badly, often with the king running away from where the battle is, in order to delay the mate as long as possible, rather than duking it out and making it difficult to win.
Is there some way to get computers to try the sort of defensive strategies that a human would use against another human?
Where the game might finish more quickly, but the human will have had some thinking to do.
Engines just don't have the concept of "allowing an opponent the biggest chance to screw up". They follow blindly their evaluation function. In an endgame, the evaluation tells it that M5 is better than M2. In an opening with piece odds, the evaluation tells it that -3 is better than -3.5. When playing with piece odds against a human, an engine doesn't win because it tricks the human into difficult positions; it wins because the human (any human) is very likely to screw up in any position. But if you match an engine with piece odds against a similar engine, you will start to see those "random" moves too.