228
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 26 points 1 month ago

Also organizations like hunting lodges put a lot of effort and money into wildlife conservation and wilderness preservation. There's a lot of natural habitat that is protected today specifically because of the work of groups of hunters. Without them that land would have been used for something else. It's obviously self-interested, but it benefits more than just them.

[-] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

Also, due to the Pittman-Robertson Act, taxes from hunting and fishing equipment and licenses are earmarked for wildlife conservation. Which is a good thing, but potentially becoming a problem as fewer people in younger generations are hunters, meaning less funding for conservation

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I think if factory farming were more stringently regulated a lot more people would hunt than buy a $500 steak.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
228 points (96.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1079 readers
1 users here now

Be respectful

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS