this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
460 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2393 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sir Richard Moore and Bill Burns did not list examples but there has been a spate of mysterious sabotage and arson attacks on infrastructure in the UK, Germany and in the Baltics.

Russia is waging a "reckless campaign of sabotage" across Europe, the heads of MI6 and the CIA have warned in their first-ever joint remarks.

Sir Richard Moore and Bill Burns also said the UK and the US faced an "unprecedented array of threats", and said the entire world order was under the most serious strain since the Cold War.

In a newspaper article, the spymasters pointed to Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine, while also describing China as "the principal intelligence and geopolitical challenge of the 21st century".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apparently unless the bot is completely anti-Semitic and calls for the death of Israel, it's Israeli biased.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The 'methodology' for rating biases that it uses is little more than one person's opinion which means it is necessarily biased.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/

No it isn't. You just don't want 'unbiased' you want 'biased toward my personal tastes'

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes it is. It's literally "pick a few numbers between 0 and 10 then take the average", mate. Can you really say it's a robust methodology? Hey, if unbiased was something on offer I'd gladly take it but it's simply not possible. MBFC does nothing but add another bias into the mix.

[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The bots job us to assert that only sources that follow approved narratives are reliable. It even insists that CIA propaganda network Radio Free Asia and its siblings are unbiased and trustworthy.

Rule 3: Sources that have (what it considers) a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

italics mine