1072
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Wow, 12/433 “good guy with a gun. That’s higher than I expected! However you still need to compare to deaths caused by “careless guy with gun” plus “scared/angry guy with gun”, which includes the latest school shooting and is much much higher

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Also: This chart only shows what happened to the attacker. It doesn't give you a picture of the innocent people on the scene shot by cops, the cops shot by cops, the "good guy with a gun" who shoots another good guy with a gun, and so on. 12/433 may be accurate, but by the time you deduct points for innocent deaths caused by people with guns on the scene, you're creeping back down to zero again.

[-] Aufschieber@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If not everyone would have guns it would probably be a lot less than 433 active shootings in the same timeframe 😅. The 12 would go to 0 quick. But the 433 would decrease a lot more than 12 🥳

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I’d also like to point out …. While the usual argument is that criminals would still have guns, many shootings like this are perpetrated by people who weren’t criminals. While the parent had poir judgement and failed their supervisory responsibility, as far as I know the kid in this latest shooting g had a “legal” gun.

While criminals with guns are certainly a problem, better gun control and mental health resources could prevent an outsized number of deaths, injuries, trauma. And don’t forget the family of the perpetrator: most other possible outcomes would be better for them than what happened

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

Very few people actually carry weapons in public in most of the US, concealed or openly. It's nothing like "most people", or even "most gun-owners". I have a lifetime concealed-carry permit, but my guns stay in the safe, save for specific events.

[-] slumberlust@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

In my experience, this statement varies drastically by what region you are in the country.

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

No argument from me. There are places that make me uncomfortable, but all the idiotic open carry shenanigans here and there are just the icing on the shit cake.

[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

this doesn't include times where the good guy was pressure for the bad guy to not attempt it. There's a reason why shootings in schools are popular, there's only 1 or 2 armed people there compared to the 1,000+ kids.

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Let's also keep in mind your average gun owner is not owning/carrying to stop a mass shooting. They are using them for self defense, especially night stand guns. If someone's breaking into my house, I'm not calling the police and hiding hoping they get there in time. I'm defending my family myself, at that exact moment

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

But that’s kind of a problem. I don’t see how your weapon can be useful for self defense in this case while also being properly secured by a responsible owner. Maybe pairing it with an alarm system or dog can get you enough warning to do both

[-] Strocker89@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago

They make quick access safes which can be mounted on or near your bed, so instead of leaving a loaded gun in a drawer where anyone can get it, it's in a locked safe with either a fingerprint or button combo unlock. The safe can be opened in seconds by someone who knows what they are doing but would otherwise keep the loaded weapon secure.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Good luck getting to it when you already have the attacker standing over you.

[-] Strocker89@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago

That's not the point. If they are already standing over you then you would be dead before you wake up. But we should never act like that is the only scenario possible

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] Strocker89@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 months ago

It's a word that in this moment means "you and I"

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] Strocker89@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

If you aren't willing to follow the societal rules of conversation then there is no point in having one.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

usually home intruders don't just walk into the bedrooms of the house while stealing shit. So that probably.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1072 points (97.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

4840 readers
2 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS