this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
313 points (93.4% liked)

Canada

7187 readers
391 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Did you bother to read the article? Her partner was a match, and could have donated a portion of their liver to her, if approved, as opposed to a donated liver.

Judge someone all you want for their previous life choices, but the decision referenced in this case should have been between the two of them and their doctor.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did you bother to read the article?

Did you? Her liver was so far gone, doctors did lot believe a partial transplant would work

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Second paragraph in: 'However, documents show the Alcohol Liver Disease (ALD) team at UHN rejected her in part because of "minimal abstinence outside of hospital." '

The article quotes Dr. Jayakumar making a general statement regarding alcohol diseased livers, but the University Health Network declined to comment on Amanda's specific case outside offering their (patronizing) condolences.

Feel free to quote the article and back up your statement.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"minimal abstinence outside of hospital."

This means she kept on drinking while not hospitalized

The rest is standard boilerplate, they can't speak about her detailed case in public

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry, maybe I'm just daft this week, but I missed the concept "the doctors believed her liver is so far gone, a partial would lot [sic] work" in that.

I quote: "Huska, he said, stopped drinking as soon as she was diagnosed with Alcohol Liver Disease on March 3 and had also registered for an alcohol cessation program to begin once she was discharged." So where does the article state she kept drinking while waiting for the transplant?

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m sorry, maybe I’m just daft this week, but I missed the concept β€œthe doctors believed her liver is so far gone, a partial would lot [sic] work” in that.

This was posted like 5 times and I assumed it was the same article... I'll find the link to the original one where they detailed this. In any case, she was not eligible because she was likely to go back to drinking and ruin the new liver...

So where does the article state she kept drinking while waiting for the transplant?

I never said that... what the article says is that she was an alcoholic since late teens and was never able to stop. She literally only stopped drinking after she found out she was going to die, and that was only like 3 months. She tried to quit before but never succeeded... that tells you she was a super high risk of relapsing

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"This means she kept drinking while out of the hospital", which directly contradicts the statement by the boyfriend saying she stopped drinking.

Everything else is like, your opinion, man.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stopping to drink for a few weeks after you realize you are about to die from drinking... doesn't really make a difference here. Unfortunately, she was an alcoholic for most of her life and, before diagnosis, did not show any capacity to quit

So, even if she did stopped drinking 100% after May... it was just too late

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's your opinion. Where does the article state that?

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's literally what the article said... she stopped drinking after diagnosis

Here, second hand from her partner (my emphasis)

Her partner Nathan Allan says he and her physicians petitioned four times for permission to get her a transplant, the only treatment that would possibly save her life. ->Huska, he said, stopped drinking as soon as she was diagnosed with Alcohol Liver Disease on March 3<- and had also registered for an alcohol cessation program to begin once she was discharged.

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not debating that she stopped drinking after diagnosis. I'm debating the rest of your opinion: "Stopping to drink for a few weeks after you realize you are about to die from drinking... doesn't really make a difference here. Unfortunately, she was an alcoholic for most of her life and, before diagnosis, did not show any capacity to quit

So, even if she did stopped drinking 100% after May... it was just too late"

So again, please back your statement up with a direct quote from the article. I'll wait, but excuse me if I don't hold my breath.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh so you want me to explain to you why there are medical directives that rule out life long alcoholics from receiving incredibly scarce organs for transplant?

There is a ton of info here (first link after googling alcoholism and relapsing)

https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/alcohol-abuse/alcohol-relapse-statistics/

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, I wanted you to quote the article. Here, I'll do it for you: "The survival rate of patients with alcohol-related liver disease who receive a deceased donor liver transplant has steadily improved to reach 80–85 per cent at one year after a transplant.

Studies show that living liver transplants for alcohol liver disease have similar survival rates to other forms of liver disease.

But a study from the University Health Network showed that 86 per cent of those with alcohol-induced liver damage who were referred for transplants were rejected. Only 14 per cent of those who applied were accepted, and just six per cent received a liver transplant. There is a concern that patients with alcohol use disorder will relapse, damaging the new organ, though studies show the risk is around 15 per cent."

... Which refutes your opinions. Gee, can't imagine why you didn't want to quote that.

I don't have to imagine why that board wouldn't want to find every excuse in the book to deny the patient the transplant either... Seems like they have several hundred thousand of them: "Using the most recent data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information on hospital bed costs (2016), Huska’s time at the Oakville hospital likely cost over $450,000 - ($3,592 per day for ICU care) with an additional 61 days in a ward bed which likely cost about $1,200 a day

A liver transplant in Ontario is pegged at about $71,000 to $100,000 in Ontario based on data from 2019."

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that survival rate is for people that do not start drinking again... So, likely not her you know

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, I read the article three times over, trying to chase down false info someone posted in here. His offer is irrelevant. The prognosis was not good enough for him to donate. They only included it in the article for the melodrama. It's nothing more than an "I would die for her!" moment. Well, I'm glad the medical board did not condone assisting him with suicide.

[–] theluckyone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Please quote the article where it states her prognosis was not good enough for him to donate. All I'm seeing is a statement that her prior alcohol consumption was a factor in that decision.