this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
561 points (89.3% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3220 readers
70 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge

You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
MrKaplan@lemmy.world
jelloeater85@lemmy.world
lwadmin@lemmy.world
Serinus@lemmy.world
561
Please Consider Defederating from rammy.site (rammy.site)
submitted 1 year ago by PowerfulTurtle@rammy.site to c/support@lemmy.world
212 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Dear Admins of the Lemmy.world instance I am asking that you please consider defederating from the rammy.site instance as soon as possible as the admin is no where to be found and it has been taken over by right wing posters posting hateful messages. There are also other people posting large amounts of spam and creating empty communities. What was once a small hobby run general purpose instance has been turned over and made into a festering right wing hate filled breeding ground by the people from exploding-heads. The only recoarse left it seems is to defederate to prevent them from spreading hate to other instances.

PS. I already sent this message to multiple admins here, sorry about that I just felt it was urgent to make sure the message was sent before these people cause more damage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dublet@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Karl Popper entered the chat.

Less well known [than other paradoxes] is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.β€”In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] CapraObscura@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is and always has been semantic bullshit.

There is no fucking paradox of intolerance.

Because you do not "tolerate" the violence that intolerance leads to, you ALLOW it.

Shooting a fucking Nazi in the face isn't intolerance. It's basic preventative maintenance for democracy.

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago

Personally I'm more concerned about the Spiral of Silence.

The spiral of silence theory, proposed by German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann in the 1970s, explains how public opinion is formed and how individuals may withhold expressing their views if they perceive them to be in the minority. This theory is often applied to political and social contexts, including the rise of ideologies like fascism.

In the context of fascism or any other controversial ideology, the spiral of silence suggests that when people believe their opinions are not widely supported, they tend to remain silent and refrain from expressing their views publicly. This silence, in turn, can create an illusion that the majority supports the prevailing ideology, even if it might not be the case. As a result, individuals who disagree with the ideology might feel isolated and discouraged from speaking out, contributing to the seeming growth and acceptance of the ideology.

I don't think people tolerate intolerance so much as they're scared to speak out.