Asklemmy

Claudia and Karina of PSL are the only decent choice I see right now. Stein and West are also better than either duopolists policy-wise and between them I'd probably prefer Stein as she seems to have more political experience and acumen (though I'd probably like West better as a person and compatriot). But for my vote it's PSL.

The problem I see is that not only will we never 'get a 3rd choice' if nobody votes for existing 3rd choices due to fear over the duopoly entrenchment, but also the duopoly has had and will continue to have zero reason to ever stop becoming more and more fascist and ignoring all of the rest of us, because they can comfortably say 'they're going to vote for us anyway because we're not [other person/party]' and wouldn't even be wrong. Dems can just keep flying to the right while talking about how bad Republicans are and pretending Fascism is a person and can be "voted out;" rather than it being a historical trend, which both parties are converging into the apex of. A trend which arises regardless of the party in power, when the natural economic downturns and crises of capitalism produce hardship and push the 'aspiring capitalist' 'small business owner' petty bourgeois toward precarity-and-fall into the increasingly-destitute working class. So then the most reactionary portion of this traditionally upper-caste group, humiliated by the 'indignity' against what they are accustomed and feel they 'deserve,' become radicalized. They get set against internal minorities and external 'threats' (scapegoated to divide society into vertical segments rather than by its horizontal class relations, thus preventing working people from uniting against the common ruling class enemy) and against the communists; who during the same capitalist crises also grow their ranks among the exploited working classes in all nations and too become radicalized and fed up by the ever-worsening state of things.

It is a trend of the big capitalists actively supporting, and the capitalist politicians half-supporting-half-willingly-capitulating to, a movement of the 'temporarily embarrassed millionaire' upper-caste petty-bourgeois radicals seeking to violently reassert and deepen the pre-existing capitalist social relations and societal divisions, along the lines of a mythologized vision of the "proper natural order of things," vote or no vote. The poem started "first they came for the communists..." Because the communists are the ones who, also radicalized by the worsening conditions on the other end, instead set out to OVERTHROW and abolish the existing social relations and divisions, which means the big capitalists and the upper-caste petty bourgeois forever lose out on their previous status and claim to positions of power over the masses. They're the only meaningful opposition and alternative, hence the adage "socialism or barbarism." And the adage "fascism is capitalism in decay."

If we accept the Democrats' dangerously ahistorical notion of what fascism is, and allow that to cow all of us to the left of Thatcher into voting for the Democrats without fail, where they never risk losing votes even for prosecuting the most-televised genocide in history and becoming increasingly just as fascist as Republicans over the last decades; then the Democrats objectively have no reason to try to even pretend catering to or pandering to the center-left liberals and socialists. There's no need for a political reorientation to recapture votes that were never lost or risked being lost in the first place. This is why the duopoly serves the ruling class so well, and why it seems to emerge so regularly. But it has had ruptures and reorientations before, even in the US, due to various strata losing faith or no longer having their interests served by the parties to which they were previously constituent. The Federalist Party doesn't exist anymore. The Whig party was formed by conservative elements that abandoned the emerging Democrat party, forming coalitions with various third parties, then itself ruptured and split. In order to stay in power, politicians were forced to reorient due to the changing material conditions and expressed interests of the voter base (which is today FAR more expansive and wielded by more actual working people [see: any] than it had been during those early reorientations).

Another historical example I found was in the British parliamentary situation around WWI when I got to chapter 9 rereading "Left-Wing" Communism: An Infantile Disorder by Lenin. The duopoly then was the Conservative Party and the Liberal Party with Labour being a minor but growing third party -- but various material and political realities activating support for Labour led to "a number of Liberals... deserting to the Labour party like rats from a sinking ship." And in the Liberal party's ever-rightward slide and their ultimate allegiance being to the ruling class and their capitalist (and imperialist) system, the liberal bourgeoisie, under the leadership of Liberal politician David Lloyd George, formed a Liberal-Conservative coalition together "abandoning the historical system of “two parties” (of exploiters), which has been hallowed by centuries of experience and has been extremely advantageous to the exploiters, and [considering] it necessary for these two parties to join forces against the Labour Party."

In the USA 35-50% of eligible people don't even vote. If that isn't proof of complete loss of faith in the duopoly, as well as prime fertile ground for activating disenfranchised people through doing the work ourselves to uplift real working class parties like the PSL into the national consciousness, who concretely advocate for empowering the least empowered, I don't know what is. This is how you force a political reorientation in the electoral system from the bottom up and lay bare the duopoly's true interests; and more importantly, from there continue movement-building among masses of now-politcally-engaged working people organizing for real work to improve our lot; like forming worker and tenants unions, pushing to end the forever wars, to nationalize the more-vacant-houses-than-homeless that exist while people freeze on the streets, and in general confront the impediments to changing society and the world for the better, things which BOTH duopoly parties stand in the way of. Worse, even

both duopoly parties are active agents in all of its worsening for the benefit and profit of the big capitalist donors they work for.

Even the relatively small movements of "Undecided electors" and Michigan Arab voters demanding better of Democrats, as well as the Democrats' dark-money Super PACs sending teams of high-paid lawyers to purge small 3rd parties from the ballot ("Democratic Party" my ass lol, I'd write in 3rd party out of spite at that point) shows that withholding votes or voting elsewhere is an impactful course of action. They are scared of exactly this, that being "better than the other guy" is not good enough. Why not show them they are right to be scared? It's not like under Biden and his cop VP who's now running for President things stopped spiraling into fascist hell domestically and abroad. Cop City is happening under democrat president and local governance, where they are tearing up Atlanta's only nature grounds to build a fascist police academy (on the plot of an old slave prison) to crush worker protests. The cops murdered a protestor and initiated the largest RICO case ever (originally created to fight organized crime), against these protestors to punish all of them together and even people who were organizing bail funds.

To say nothing of women's right to choose, book burnings, anti-LGBTQ acts all still happening under democrats. Abortion rights and LGBTQ civil protections could have been passed and codified when Obama's Democrat regime had both houses of Congress. Biden could've been forcefully pressuring the expansion of the court (after Obama gave away a seat in capitulation no less) but instead cowers from "politicizing the court" as if that ship isn't sailed and past the horizon. They don't do this stuff, because they don't actually care about any of us. They care about appealing to their donors, monopolizing our votes, and selling us shit. Abortion rights being under threat is actually great for them, because they can drum up fear and anger about the Republicans. LGBTQ people's rights being attacked is great for them, because they can weep crocodile tears and shake their fists about how evil Republicans are and "if only we get voted in this time we'll solve it!!!" while doing little to nothing to fight it but occasional unenforceable half measures and symbolic gestures of "support". This is all happening and increasing anyway, because fascism isn't a person, or even a party. It's a trend which grows out of capitalist crisis as a class movement. And Democrats and Republicans are both among and represent the same class which supports fascism, historically and now. And they're doing everything they can to demonstrate that fact to all of us.

To my mind our votes are supposed to be earned, not taken for granted, and unless we put them toward who actually earns them through deed and not just two-faced empty word, and withhold them from those who don't, none of the ruling class has to even pretend to remember or care about that fact.