541
submitted 6 days ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 247 points 6 days ago

Gosh, imagine that... the party that wants to turn women into forced breeders isn't popular with the people they want to turn into forced breeders.

The actually surprising shift is that Gen Z men are more conservative and less likely to identify as supporting feminists than Millenials.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago

I don’t find that hard to believe at all, young men are not fans of feminism and it’s affecting their judgment of leftist economic policies.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 16 points 6 days ago

And propagandists are exploiting that as well. They feel all their issues with the changes in dating and relationships in general are the fault of "the left" and women in general, there are no shortage of people waiting to jump on those points for their own financial and political gain.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works -3 points 6 days ago

Of course they will, it’s not on them to do so differently.

Imo it’s on democrats and “left leaning parties” to appeal to young men and maybe put similar attention to men’s issues as they do for women’s.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

But their issues with society aren't the fault of society. They don't measure up in whatever way, don't aim to improve themselves, and then go and blame everyone else but themselves.

I say this as a perpetually single guy (a decade since my last relationship) who isn't exactly an incel in the meaning of that term, but am in the literal "involuntary" part. I just recognize I'm the problem not changes in society.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I don't think I would agree that society is not at fault. When you tell an entire generation of men that their worth is in the economic value they create and then refuse to pay them more than a pittance it is easy to see why they might be upset by that. That's only one aspect of the problem but it's absolutely societal in nature.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I absolutely agree on that aspect. I myself am a "victim" of that mentality. I never "found" myself and have ended up uneducated and working in a factory. For that reason I see myself as completely worthless. When I used dating sites I'd skip over anyone with a solid profession as "they'd never settle for a worthless schmuck like me anyway, they deserve better and they know it." So it actually ties multiple issues together.

The only difference is I don't blame society, I blame myself for being pathetic.

[-] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

And society for a long while portrayed a woman's roles and responsibilities around the house and raising a family. That makes people think that is what women want, and when no woman wants to do that with them, they blame something that's not themselves

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah no. “Appeal to men” these days means telling them it’s ok to be assholes to women because that’s what they want to hear.

And I will have nothing to do with a party like that. It’s why I don’t vote republican.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

agreed, and this is not unique to the US. Europe and UK are struggling with it as well.

load more comments (42 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
541 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18874 readers
3790 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS