FediLore + Fedidrama

2260 readers

17 users here now

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

sexy_peach@feddit.org

11 day old moderator of c/vegan overstepping their position (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by Thelemmybud@lemmy.world to c/fediverselore@lemmy.ca

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well I'm not a mod and I didn't demod you, but from my opinion of how it played out A, you immediately jumped to Beavers defense and said you didn't have a problem banning people for downvoting, B, immediately tried to downplay them not responding to the mod request to discuss that action, C, based on how you're responding here sound completely unfit to be a mod which should require a certain level of maturity, and of course D the possibility that you're an alt.

[+] jerkface@lemmy.ca -21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. Interesting thoughts.

A) is an opinion and it was stated as an opinion, since the post served in place of the discussion that was skipped. I feel justified in sharing my opinion about the direction I want the community to take. I can't force my views on anyone, and it seems amazingly insecure to respond to that with a unilateral de-mod.

B) was a request for patience and discussion before people started de-modding each other. But okay, let's call it "downplaying" for the sake of argument. I don't see how such downplaying amounts to justification to de-mod me.

C) I can't respond to but I do find it rather uncharitable. If you can give an example, I'd appreciate that. And D) I can never assure someone who wishes to believe otherwise.

When it comes down to it, it sounds like you are saying the other mod was justified in de-modding me because I voiced disagreement with his choices. Plus a bunch of other stuff about me just plain not deserving to be a mod for reasons I admit I don't grasp; that I'm just intrinsically deserving of being de-modded. Have I got it?

[–] AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The only part of your biased, self-serving spin on everything I said which I agree with is the part where you said you are not deserving to be a mod.