9
submitted 2 months ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/energy@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Serious doubts this harvests more energy than it wasted in materials

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Would the materials have much more of a footprint than geothermal installations? Because that slight 7° difference between below ground temp and above ground temps apparently justifies the labor, materials, and power to the circulators for harvesting geothermal energy. So this seems to be the same but adding a cherry on top -- incorporating a heat pump to add to the energy of a geothermal system.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Would be a matter of scale. Geothermal has essentially infinite thermal mass, whereas this has a very limited amount of heat produced by bodies.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
9 points (76.5% liked)

Green Energy

2187 readers
21 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS