this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
555 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32315 readers
762 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The vast majority of the world voted at the UN General Assembly to demand an end to Israel’s unlawful occupation of Palestinian territory within 12 months, with 124 countries (64%) in favor, 14 (7%) against, and 43 (22%) abstentions.

The General Assembly resolution was based on a July ruling by the top UN legal authority, the International Court of Justice, which stated that “Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful” and that “Israel is under an obligation to bring to an end its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible”.

The countries that voted against the resolution, in effect supporting Israel’s illegal occupation, were the United States, Israel, Argentina, Czechia, Hungary, Malawi, Papa New Guinea, and Paraguay, plus the tiny Pacific island nations of Fiji, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, and Tuvalu.

These small island countries that consistently echo Washington’s unpopular votes in the UN are essentially unofficial US colonies, and mostly use the US dollar or Australian dollar as their currencies. Together, the six have a combined population of just over 1 million people, making them some of the smallest nations on Earth.

Among the large countries that abstained were India, Australia, Canada, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Ethiopia.

However, in a break with Washington, a few longtime US allies voted in support of the resolution, most notably Japan, as well as France, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain.

Several countries did not vote in the September 18 General Assembly session. These include a few nations that would without a doubt have supported the resolution, such as Venezuela, which lost its voting rights because it cannot pay UN membership fees due to illegal Western sanctions. The US and its European allies have stolen billions of dollars of Venezuelan foreign assets and reserves, and Washington has blocked Venezuela from using the US-controlled financial system.

The resolution was not controversial; it simply called for the implementation of a decision by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the UN’s top legal body.

On July 19, the ICJ issued a historic ruling stating:

– the State of Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful;

– the State of Israel is under an obligation to bring to an end its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible;

– the State of Israel is under an obligation to cease immediately all new settlement activities, and to evacuate all settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

– the State of Israel has the obligation to make reparation for the damage caused to all the natural or legal persons concerned in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

– all States are under an obligation not to recognize as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by the continued presence of the State of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Since war broke out in Gaza in October 2023, Washington has repeatedly vetoed Security Council resolutions that call for peace and a ceasefire.

US President Joe Biden has strongly supported Israel as it has brutally bombed civilians in Gaza, in what UN experts say is a campaign of genocide.

In a press conference in Tel Aviv in October, Biden asserted that “if Israel didn’t exist, we’d have to invent it”, given how strategic the colonial state is for US imperial interests.

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The fact that Ukraine "abstained" should make you libs think.

I know you won't though lol

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago

ukraine abstained because the US has them over a barrel

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ukraine may have a terrible, far right regime, but this vote doesn't really say much about it, given that their survival currently depends on not pissing off the USA in any way. If their major military support was coming from a country that wanted it the other way around it would've been that way, there's no principle behind it.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

And there is the not thinking

Like clockwork

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Can you counter point it rather than just saying 'not thinking'? From these comments you're coming off as the not thinking one.

It makes sense that Ukraine would cosy up to USA if USA has something Ukraine needs, no?

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nah it's you that is not thinking. It is specifically the USA which is the problem. You can see that this map is, unusually, not "always the same map", with many right wing neoliberal countries (France, Japan, New Zealand, ...) voting for this. It's not at all about the internal political alignment of the countries and just about who is a US proxy.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Ok, and also the most extreme islamophobes (India, Sweden, Czechie, Hungary, ...). But the division on this map is notably different from the usual one.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If their major military support was coming from a country that wanted it the other way around it would’ve been that way, there’s no principle behind it.

That's the principle of being corrupted and in for nothing but power.

[–] Name@feddit.nu 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not necessarily lmao. Bet most countries would feel the need to follow the lead of the country literally keeping them from ceasing to exist. It's just realist power dynamics.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

Yes it's rulers power dynamics

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fuck off. Their interest lies with their own survival at the moment and that is strongly connected to a certain superpower voting no. Again, fuck off with that bullshit.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

so conditional genocide support is acceptable to you.