this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
1955 points (97.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
134 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    For those who are wondering, yes, Wine is malware compatible so be careful about the EXEs you run!

    https://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#Is_Wine_malware-compatible.3F

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] nogrub@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    no matter what os you use you can get viruses on linux and macos the chanche is slimmer because they have a smaller user base. the only way to not get viruses is to use your brain. for those who don't know there are linux viruses and you can get them if you don't pay attention

    [–] matter@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    People say this but I don't think it's true. The vast majority of internet servers run on Linux and they are much higher-value targets than your laptop. It is more secure than windows, not just because of the smaller user base. However you're right of course that you can still get viruses.

    [–] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

    The other counterpoint is Mac OS 9 and earlier. Had a minority of the user share, had a ton of viruses.

    [–] deeznutz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Those servers have teams of trained individuals whose job is to secure them and keep them bulletproof. It's a bit different from grandma downloading random crap on her Linux mint desktop to be fair.

    [–] matter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

    Sure, I agree with that - although you might be surprised how many of them don't. But that's kind of the point, web servers are massive targets for virus development, and yet even grandma's Linux Mint still doesn't get viruses that often.

    [–] PlutoParty@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Which part are you saying isn't true?

    [–] matter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    That the lack of Linux viruses is mostly/specifically due to lower user base. It's probably a factor but I don't think it's the primary reason.

    [–] Tekchip@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Did you read the thread you just replied to? Most of the internet, hundreds of millions (probably trillions but I'm being conservative) of servers, all run Linux. Linux is a minority on desktop computers, yes, but it's a majority of computers on the planet. For every one or two computers an individual might have there are a multitude of servers (that's not just base servers but all the virtual servers, docker containers, IOT, and mobile devices). 10's of these per person if not hundreds. All linux. Your argument that it's a smaller user base is patently false. You're using linux right now and don't even know it.

    [–] PlutoParty@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Pretty sure that is what they are saying. They are the one who initially said that in this thread. I read them saying lower user base as meaning a lower desktop user base, which you acknowledge. Or maybe you're responding to the wrong person.

    [–] Tekchip@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

    I see your point. I did not catch the proper context given your comment prior. That's my bad. Thanks for pointing that out and being gentle with me. Disregard my comment. Going to leave it in case someone who does think that way happens upon it.